The Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund (SIBTF)
The Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund (SIBTF) was formerly known as the Subsequent Injuries Fund (SIF), addresses complex cases involving severe injuries. These cases arise when a pre-existing disability combines with a subsequent industrial injury, resulting in a current disability of 70% or more. The primary concept behind these cases is to provide compensation to handicapped workers who experience additional industrial injuries. This approach also shields employers from liability, thereby encouraging them to hire disabled individuals.
In specific terms, SIBTF cases offer supplementary benefits under defined circumstances. These cases emerge when an employee with a prior disability sustains another workplace injury. The SIBTF provides compensation to cover the remaining combined permanent disability resulting from the most recent injury. This compensation is reduced by the amount of benefits received by the employee due to the preexisting disability. The funds for these payments are sourced from the Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund (SIF), which is a state-monitored trust funded through surcharges imposed on employers based on their payrolls.
For severe injuries, the SIBTF enables the affected employee to receive compensation that aligns with their overall disability level. Importantly, this compensation doesn't make the employer accountable for more than what's due for the latest industrial injury. The underlying purpose of this provision is to foster the hiring and retention of disabled workers.
Notably, the information provided references legal cases such as "State of California v. Ind. Acc. Com. (1957) 147 Cal.App.2d 818, 822," which has been disapproved on other grounds by "Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1961) 56 Cal.2d 842, 846."
The excerpt you provided is a detailed explanation of the provisions outlined in Labor Code Section 4751 regarding Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund (SIBTF) cases. This section of the labor code outlines the conditions under which an employee who is permanently partially disabled may be eligible for additional compensation in the case of a subsequent compensable injury.
Here is a summary of the key points from the passage:
1. Eligibility Criterion: An employee who is already permanently partially disabled may be eligible for additional compensation if they receive a subsequent compensable injury.
2. Degree of Disability:
The combined effect of both disabilities (the prior disability and the subsequent injury) must result in a degree of permanent disability that is equal to 70 percent or more of the total disability.
3. Additional Compensation: In such cases, the employee shall receive compensation for the remainder of the combined permanent disability existing after the last injury.
4. Criteria for Compensation:
• Criteria (a): If the previous disability or impairment affected a specific body part (hand, arm, foot, leg, or eye), and the permanent disability resulting from the subsequent injury affects the opposite and corresponding member, the latter permanent disability should be at least 5 percent of total disability.
• Criteria (b): If the permanent disability resulting from the subsequent injury alone (considered without regard to occupation or age) is 35 percent or more of the total disability, the employee is eligible for compensation.
This section essentially establishes the conditions and criteria for providing compensation to employees with pre-existing disabilities who experience subsequent industrial injuries resulting in increased permanent disability. It outlines the thresholds and considerations to determine eligibility and the extent of compensation.
The passage you provided elaborates on the requirement of the "opposite and corresponding member" in Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund (SIBTF) cases as outlined in Labor Code Section 4751. This requirement is significant for determining
1. Impact on Opposite and Corresponding Member:
For an applicant to qualify for SIBTF benefits based on the 5% "opposite and corresponding member" criterion, it's not necessary for the subsequent injury to directly injure the opposite member. The requirement is that the subsequent injury must affect the opposite and corresponding member of the previously impaired body part.
2. Case Example (Hard v. WCAB):
The passage cites the case of Hard v. WCAB (1974) 2 CWCR 48 as an example. In this case, the applicant had a pre-existing loss of the left leg. The subsequent industrial injury was a back injury that caused issues in the right leg, which is the opposite and corresponding member to the previously impaired left leg. The WCAB panel ruled that the applicant qualifies for SIBTF benefits based on this scenario.
3. Case Example (Gillispie v. Plastech):
Another example cited is Gillispie v. Plastech (SIBTF) (2010) 38 CWCR 304 (WCAB). In this case, the WCAB clarified that Labor Code Section 4751 only requires that the subsequent injury "affect the opposite and corresponding member." It doesn't necessitate that the opposite member has pathology or be directly injured.
4. Broad Application:
The "opposite and corresponding member" requirement is not limited to extremities; it can apply to other body parts as well. The passage cites an example where an industrial injury accelerated an existing disease process causing blindness in one eye, while the other eye had already suffered a complete loss of vision due to the same disease process. This situation satisfied the "opposite and corresponding" criterion.
5. Interaction with Disability Ratings:
The subsequent injury doesn't need to result in a 5% disability in the opposite and corresponding member alone. If the subsequent injury and the pre-existing impairment combine to result in a 5% or more overall disability, the criterion is met. The subsequent injury must affect the opposite and corresponding member and contribute to the overall disability.
This information provides a comprehensive understanding of how the "opposite and corresponding member" requirement is applied in SIBTF cases.
The passage you provided explains the intricacies of the 35% threshold in Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund (SIBTF) cases, particularly in relation to the Disability Further Earning Capacity (DFEC) modifier and the calculation of permanent disability ratings. Here's a breakdown of the key points:
1. 35% Threshold Calculation:
The 35% threshold for SIBTF eligibility is calculated before any adjustment for occupation and age. This means that the calculation is based solely on the degree of permanent disability resulting from the combination of the pre-existing disability and the subsequent industrial injury, without taking into account the specific occupation of the employee or their age.
2. Inclusion of DFEC Modifier: The Disability Further Earning Capacity (DFEC) modifier, which reflects the impact of the injury on the individual's ability to earn, must be factored into the calculation of the permanent disability rating for the subsequent injury before considering the adjustment for occupation and age. The language of Labor Code Section 4751 specifies that only adjustments for age and occupation are excluded, implying that other adjustments, such as the DFEC modifier, should be considered.
3. Conflicting Panel Decisions:
There are conflicting decisions from the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) regarding whether the DFEC modifier should be included when determining if the 35% threshold is met. The passage cites two specific cases to illustrate this conflict:
- In Khandikian vs. SIBTF (2015) ADJ9150217 (Van Nuys), it was held that the DFEC modifier should be considered when determining whether the 35% threshold is met.
- In Malen v. Kitchen Works (2011) 2011 Cal.Wrk.Comp. P.D. LEXIS 84, a WCAB Panel approved the determination that the industrial disability (permanent disability rating) must be calculated before any adjustment for DFEC.
These conflicting panel decisions highlight the complexity and differing interpretations regarding the inclusion of the DFEC modifier in relation to the 35% threshold. It's an area of ambiguity that may have implications for how SIBTF eligibility is assessed.
This information provides insight into the complexities of the 35% threshold and the consideration of the DFEC modifier in SIBTF cases.
The passage you provided discusses the requirements and considerations related to pre-existing disabilities in Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund (SIBTF) cases.
Here's a breakdown of the key points:
1. Chief Requirement for SIBTF Benefits:
The primary requirement for eligibility for SIBTF benefits is that the pre-existing condition must have been "labor disabling" before the subsequent industrial injury occurs. This term is used to signify that the condition should have been a disability that would be ratable if it had been caused by an industrial injury.
2. Timing of Pre-existing Disability:
The pre-existing disability must have been present at the time of the subsequent industrial injury. The passage cites cases that establish that the disability should exist before the industrial injury and cannot be assigned retroactively after the occurrence of the injury.
3. Nature of Pre-existing Disability:
The pre-existing disability does not necessarily need to have caused an actual loss of earnings. It should, however, be the type of disability for which a partial permanent award could have been made if it were caused by an industrial injury. This distinction is important to differentiate between pre-existing conditions that could be considered as part of SIBTF cases and conditions that are merely aggravated or accelerated by the subsequent injury.
4. Use of AMA Ratings and Burden of Proof:
The passage mentions that current American Medical Association (AMA) ratings under the 2005 Permanent Disability Rating Schedule (PDRS) can satisfy the pre-existing permanent disability (PD) requirement. If an applicant demonstrates a disability under the AMA guides, the burden then shifts to the SIBTF to provide evidence to challenge or rebut the rating under the AMA guides.
5. Multiple Prior WCAB Awards of Permanent Disability:
In cases where an individual has multiple prior Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) awards of permanent disability, these prior awards are typically added together without dilution. This addition is made without using the Multiple Disabilities Table (MDT) from the 1997 PDRS or the Combined Values Chart (CVC) from the 2005 PDRS. The MDT and CVC are designed to combine disabilities from a single injury to multiple body parts to avoid exceeding the 100% limit for one injury.
This information provides insight into the requirements and considerations surrounding pre-existing disabilities in SIBTF cases.
The passage you provided discusses how awards from the Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund (SIBTF) relate to Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits.Here's a breakdown of the key points:
1. Offset Rules: The passage mentions that under the Program Operations Manual System (POMS) Section DI 52120.030, the Social Security Administration (SSA) has established rules for offsets in SIBTF cases. An offset refers to the reduction of one benefit due to the receipt of another benefit to prevent "double dipping" or overcompensation.
2. Basic WC Payment Offsettable: The passage indicates that the basic workers' compensation (WC) payment is offsettable against SSDI benefits. This means that if an individual receives both WC payments and SSDI benefits, the SSA may reduce the SSDI benefits by the amount of the WC payments to avoid receiving duplicate compensation for the same disability.
3. Non-Offsettable SIBTF Payments:
However, the passage notes that the additional payments made from the Subsequent Injuries Fund (SIF) are not offsettable against SSDI benefits. This implies that the additional compensation received from SIBTF does not lead to a reduction in SSDI benefits.
4. Reverse Offset Applies:
The passage mentions "reverse offset." This term likely indicates that while the basic WC payment is offsettable against SSDI benefits, the reverse is not true for SIBTF payments. In other words, SIBTF payments are not subject to reduction due to the receipt of SSDI benefits.
Overall, this information provides insight into how SIBTF awards and SSDI benefits interact, particularly with respect to offset rules. If you have further questions or need more clarification, feel free to ask.
The passage you provided discusses SIF (Subsequent Injuries Fund) credits and how they are governed by California Labor Code Section 4753. Here's a breakdown of the key points:
1. SIF Credits and Compensation Reduction:
According to California Labor Code Section 4753, any additional compensation provided by SIF is not in addition to other monetary payments received by the employee for their preexisting disability or impairment. Instead, it shall be reduced to the extent of any other payments received from any source. However, certain payments are exempt from this reduction, such as pension or other compensation for disability incurred in the armed forces of the United States, as well as assistance under specific provisions of the Welfare and Institutions Code. Additionally, the employee can exclude a sum equal to attorney's fees, costs, and expenses related to the recovery of monetary payments.
2. Veteran's Benefits and Service-Connected Disabilities:
The passage states that SIF is not entitled to credit for veteran's benefits or service-connected disabilities. It refers to a case, Webineer v. WCAB (SIF) (1975) 40 CCC 774, which establishes that SIF is only entitled to a credit for payments made under a Veterans Administration pension and Social Security disability benefits to the extent that they are for a non-service-connected disability that pre-existed the industrial injury.
3. Credit for SSDI Benefits:
The passage explains that SIF is entitled to credit for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits, but only for the percentage of SSDI benefits that is related to the pre-existing permanent disability (PD). The formula mentioned is: (100% - Compensation PD) x SSDI benefits = offset. This means that the credit is based on the portion of SSDI benefits that would overlap with the pre-existing PD covered by SIF.
4. End of SSDI Credit at Retirement:
The passage notes that the SSDI credit will end when the worker reaches retirement age and SSDI benefits convert to retirement benefits. This implies that the credit for SIF will no longer apply once the individual transitions from SSDI to retirement benefits from the Social Security Administration.
5. Complexity of Calculating SSDI Credit:
The passage acknowledges that calculating the SSDI credit can be complex. Several pieces of information are needed, including the date of entitlement to SSDI benefits, changes in monthly SSDI benefits over time, reasons for SSDI benefit termination if applicable, and the date of entitlement to retirement benefits. Obtaining this information from the Social Security Administration, likely through SSA form WNPSC-3070E (dated 9/07), is recommended to accurately assess the credit.
Overall, this information provides insights into how SIF credits and SSDI benefits are interconnected and how they can impact the compensation received by the individual.
In SIBTF (Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund) cases, the statute of limitations is a bit complex and can be influenced by various factors. Here's a breakdown of the key points related to the statute of limitations for SIBTF cases:
1. No Direct Statute of Limitations:
Unlike some other types of claims, there is no specific statute of limitations that directly applies to SIBTF cases. This means that there's no fixed timeframe within which a SIBTF application must be filed.
2. Filing Within a Reasonable Time:
The SIBTF application must be filed within a reasonable time after the applicant becomes aware or should reasonably become aware that there's a substantial likelihood they have a claim for SIBTF benefits.
3. Interaction with Labor Code Section 5410: If a SIBTF claim is filed within the five-year period specified in Labor Code Section 5410, it is considered timely filed. However, it's important to note that the five-year limitation period in Section 5410 does not directly apply to claims for SIBTF benefits.
4. Complex Cases and Timeliness: SIBTF cases are often complex, and the issue of timeliness can be more intricate when the SIBTF application is filed more than 5 years after the date of injury. If the case is complex and the applicant could not reasonably have known that there was a viable SIF claim before the 5-year mark in LC 5410, filing the SIBTF application within a reasonable time after a WCAB finding on the issue of permanent disability may still be considered timely.
5. Supreme Court Decisions:
The passage mentions two California Supreme Court cases: Subsequent Injuries Fund v. WCAB (Talcott) (1970) 2 Cal.3d 56 and Subsequent Injuries Fund v. WCAB (Baca) (1970) 2 Cal.3d 74. These cases provide guidance on the timeliness of SIBTF claims. Talcott held that if an applicant doesn't know and couldn't reasonably know within five years from the date of injury that they might become entitled to subsequent injuries benefits, their application against the Fund won't be barred. They can still file a proceeding against the Fund within a reasonable time after learning about the Board's findings on permanent disability that the Fund has probable liability. Baca, on the other hand, ruled that if an applicant files a Petition to Reopen (and thus obtains a WCAB finding on PD), and they don't file the SIF case within a reasonable time after the WCAB finding on PD, the SIF claim could be barred.
6. Interaction with Petition to Reopen:
If a Petition to Reopen is filed and there's any possibility of an SIF case, it's recommended to file the SIF case along with the Petition to Reopen, or at least within the 5-year period specified in LC 5410. This approach helps avoid the risk of the SIF case being barred under the principles outlined in the Baca case.
Overall, the statute of limitations for SIBTF cases is not as straightforward as in some other cases. It often depends on the complexity of the situation and the timing of certain events, such as WCAB findings on permanent disability and the filing of Petitions to Reopen.
Call for a medical evaluation. Call (800) 310-8707
Request An Exam
Contact us, request an exam or join our network.
Services
Education
Doctors
HEADQUARTERS
14623 Hawthorne Blvd. Suite 307,
Lawndale, CA 90260
Call toll free (800) 310-8707
Fax (424) 239-2666